“I don’t like the word ‘suspicious,’” my friend said while reviewing my list of “little things that can change the world.” “Use ‘be discerning’ or ‘filter.’” “‘Suspicious’ is too negative.”

But I’ve been thinking about it and a healthy dose of suspicion seems right. We’ve already looked at this in terms of ourselves. “Be willing to be wrong.” Maybe the idea, or, in this case, the word ‘suspicious,’ is wrong. Maybe wanting to make suspicion sound better helps us avoid dealing with it. In my mind if I’m being discerning, I’m making good choices. Suspicious?  I can’t take myself that seriously. Perhaps that choice, idea, or action is just ridiculous or, simply, wrong.

It’s easier, and perhaps more useful, to see how this works in the world around us. We are inundated with information these days. But when radio and newspapers were our main sources, it was clear that facts were often wrong. And on the Internet anyone can publish anything. And do. All you need is one instance of knowing the facts. Perhaps it’s an article about you. “But, but, I never lived in New Jersey. I just have friends there.” “Sedgwick Glues Shakespeare”  [true title of a newspaper article]. Well, I may have jokingly said that, but the whole piece was a little more grandiose than the facts.

I’ve been introduced with titles I’ve never had. (The number of places I’ve been the “director” when I wasn’t or one place where I was and was called the office assistant…) And we’ve all seen things on Facebook incorrectly identified. None of which matter. But they were wrong. Period. For example on Facebook there are petitions to sign that are years old and therefore not relevant. And then there are the stories that make us angry and, if we dare investigate, are simply not true. Or have only a thread of truth in a complicated woven fabric of misrepresentations.

The website Snopes has saved many a reputation when someone was suspicious about the facts and checked. Of course there are also suspicions about Snopes, especially when the apparent truth isn’t what someone wants it to be, which is usually when politics is involved. And then there is the fact that the online source of all information Wikipedia  requests new facts and updates and is apparently written by anyone willing to write. That information too can be simply wrong or misleading when one knows the facts.

With print or media, news often seems geared to what sounds sensational rather than to what’s actually happening. For example I knew people who were participating in a major peace conference in Southern Africa where all the media reports talked about how the process had fallen apart, people had walked out, and tension abounded. Yes, a few people representing major countries walked out. But those who remained, including people affiliated with those who “walked out,”  had an incredibly productive and peaceful event—something that the press people covering the event on location finally told the participants their bosses wouldn’t print or broadcast even though they dutifully sent in the stories. The news was the walk-out and the fact the major world event was actually meeting its goals was not going to be shared.

Look at trying to untangle the truth in politics. Sometimes one has copies of speeches, but even then it is hard to verify the events and facts the speeches cite. Accusations are shared whether based on fact or not. But all of this is printed, broadcast, retweeted, and shared by those who want it to be true or are afraid it might be.

Finally look at your own life and history.

Could there be another reason Sue didn’t return your call besides because you told her she doesn’t look great in green? Might that cute girl not be ignoring you because you don’t look fit, but because you look interesting and she’s afraid? And what about that ad you almost didn’t open that turned out to be a scholarship offer [true story]?

Is your version of the Sunday afternoon at the beach, which you remember vividly and so assume is true, the same as your partner’s or child’s? I’d bet not. Maybe I just have a bad memory, but I hear all the time of events shared and places I’ve been that I don’t remember at all and different details about the events I do.

Suspicious. Suspicion. The challenge here is not to give up or even to question everything, but to be healthily skeptical. Do it, perhaps, as a game when people seem to be taking things very seriously or not seriously enough, in your opinion. If something seems like gossip, for example, and it matters to you to know, find out. Shoot, go ask. Is something too good to be true? Check it out. For it is your world that is being filtered here. And how we protect ourselves and present ourselves impacts the whole.

_______________________________

Photo credits from the top:
Ipswich, Waterfront, Ipswich Campus, The Big Question Mark Sculpture — Martin Pettitt
Movie poster — source unknown
Magnifying glass on lock — Spirit Moxie (with thanks to Sherry Runyon of Kontras)

A few days ago I got on a fairly crowded bus (“Use Public Transportation” is a post for another time) and a young black man leapt to his feet to give me his seat. I started to protest, but he’d already moved down the aisle so I dutifully sat. But his exchange started the usual whirl of thoughts. “Do I look that old?” “Is this a black/white legacy?” “Surely I don’t look that old!!” “And why me of all the people standing?” “I guess I can’t give up my seat.”

It also reminded me of a similar incident a few of months ago when I talked a guy out of giving me his seat, but the young woman behind him wouldn’t take “no” for an answer. “I’m getting off right away,” she said—which, by the way, wasn’t true, although I think she got off before I did.

I don’t know about you, but somewhere, somehow, I have missed the gift (yes, the gift) of receiving. It began when my mother-in-law gave me red, one-piece polyester “jump shorts” the first Christmas of our marriage. Cute in style, but I don’t usually like “cute” and the material had an embossed, same color pattern that to my 21 year old eyes (yup – married young) looked incredibly tacky. Somehow I shared how I felt with her. She never gave me clothes again. Heck, I’m pretty sure she avoided giving me or my children (yes, her grandchildren) anything personal from that time on.

Then, there was the time I mentioned that the single roses a friend frequently gave me on perfect occasions always wilted within a day, thinking he’d evaluate the source. He just never gave me a rose again. Even when someone gives me something I think is perfect I don’t get it quite right. When my partner gave me my dream ring, nearly his first words were, “I knew you wouldn’t wear it!” (I’d taken it off to cook.)

I know children who delight in any gift whether penny candy or a new phone. As a result, people love to give them things. But while I think I love presents, there is something in my reception of them that often rings false.

And that’s for the “good stuff.” For all of us, I assume, there is the “loot” that appears that we all wish would go away: one more necktie, candy when you’re on a diet, the gift card from the store you’re boycotting, the jacket three sizes too big (or small). We joke about re-gifting but that often isn’t an option if the gift is from family or a close friend. Or despite yourself you “honestly” blurt out what you really did with it (“I knew you wouldn’t mind that I accidentally ‘dropped’ it in the middle of Times Square!”)

Stores offer gift receipts that somehow never get packed with gifts you don’t want. Plus I live in fear of encountering someone who believes that if you admire something they should give it to you. (“I love that dress ON YOU…” So far that’s worked. Most of the time.)

But all these reactions aren’t the point, really. When I started writing this post, I thought that the main point was that accepting gifts isn’t about you or me. And it isn’t about the item offered, either. I thought I was coming to realize that the important point was simply that the gifts were given. At that moment. And in that context, it was important to the giver that a gift, that gift, be given. I was so sure of this that I didn’t even search on Google for “accept gifts” until I thought this post was finished. Then I checked Google and was surprised to see that “accept gifts graciously” appeared with multiple links. And many of these links agree with this idea.

So I’m not the only one who believes that gifts are given because the person wants to connect in some way. People present gifts because you’re leaving a job and they don’t know what to say. It is the drink someone wants to share, whether you want one or not, because they need to talk. It is the love of tradition during the holidays and on birthdays where merely having things to unwrap represents the ritual of the day. It’s offering you a seat on the bus because that’s what one does. There are also the gifts you get just because you gave one (we’ll talk about the giving part another time). You can add more.

However I realize that this logic ignores things we’ve already explored. For one it ignores the importance of giving thanks, that simple ritual so basic to changing the world. (Some of the Google links do share that.) But I think that even more important is that, at the moment you are offered that truly horrible gift, you are willing to be wrong in thinking the gift is horrible or unneeded, and so, learn something about yourself. Let us suppose that at that moment, whatever it is that is being given to you is exactly what you need—even though you had not thought so before. Can you see it? Perhaps you suddenly realize how important it is to support the giver. Perhaps the gift is telling you something about the giver that it is important for you know. Perhaps you realize the gift is really one of inclusion as you honestly thank someone for bringing that piece of cake by your desk (the one that you then have to figure out how to throw away without anyone seeing). Perhaps you need to stop thinking you should and can provide everything for yourself.

But how else does “accepting gifts” change our world? There are at least two things to consider on accepting them and I’m betting there are more than that. First, see the additional possibilities or information in the gift. If you received 10 more neckties, could it be a weaving or a collage—a brand new piece of art? At the age of 21, what my mother-in-law did not know was that I felt embarrassed wearing red. That color was much too bold. Since then I’ve learned it is one of the very best colors for me to wear, and I think she knew that. Might I have learned that about myself sooner if I had really seen my mother-in-law’s gift? Creativity. Insight. Information.

The second challenge found through accepting gifts is to see the world as abundant. It is through abundance that positive change can occur. We are challenged to see the world as a place of more neckties than we need, delicious food to share, and outfits that expand the possibilities for, well, everything. Realizing this abundance is one of the core components of how Spirit Moxie works. It is only in the overflow that new (and for us positive) patterns can be born.

Meanwhile, maybe you’ve always understood how to “accept gifts” in the right way. If so could you please share tips with the rest of us? For on a deep level accepting a gift changes us, the recipients, and on an even deeper level it will always change the world. At the very least, maybe you’ll get lucky on that crowded bus and get a seat.

___________________________________
Photo credits from the top:

Birthday present with a bow — shorts and longs —Julie Rybarczyk
The perfect ring — Spirit Moxie
Tie collection: “a strangling of ties” ?— rjp (zimipenfish)
Bus seats — Spirit Moxie

We all know that brushing our teeth is important. Our moms told us. Our dentists and hygienists tell us. Most of us know that brushing helps prevent tooth decay and gum disease and that it helps keep bad breath at bay (which might have something to do with making the world work better!). Furthermore, brushing has been increasingly linked to heart health, and I just found a website that makes the case for linking not brushing to respiratory disease, premature births, dementia, and erectile dysfunction. The article also says that brushing your teeth can help with weight loss as well as improve your sex life. From reading all of this I now know I should be brushing for two to three minutes each time. Somehow I missed that in the instructions!

This is all very well, but what does it have to do with helping the world work (except of course for the bad breath part)? Quite simply, our health, our personal health, helps the whole world to work better, not just our own corner of it. When we claim the responsibility of being part of the world, we see that by taking charge of our health we contribute monetarily and productively.

Monetarily, we contribute by not adding extra burdens to the healthcare system or straining our own resources or those of our families. Quite apart from the online scrambling caused by the Affordable Care Act, human resource people know that a healthy employee both saves the company money on insurance costs and is more productive. In fact last year the costs (not including medical insurance costs) of poor health and the resulting lost productivity cost employers between $225.8 and $344 billion.

When we are healthy we are more productive plus we free ourselves by having the energy to do what we’re called to do. We’re more fun to be around when we’re healthy. Can you see the spiral and the tags on this one? While many people have health concerns, even major health issues, it is how an individual deals with those problems that ultimately determines the affect on others.

So take brushing your teeth as a commitment to yourself. And remember while you’re brushing that a commitment to yourself actually benefits others.

You can’t help the world work if your body doesn’t work. Really.

What are the “little things” you do that would help the rest of us ensure our good health?

Medical review by Amy Ammer, hygienist, courtesy of Andrew J. Marck, DDS

Photo credits from the top:
Brush Your Teeth Twice a Day Day — @NonProfitOrgs
Costco electric toothbrush display — Spirit Moxie
Toothbrush3 — © Serna | Dreamstime Stock Photos & Stock Free Images
habits-toothbrush-1a–richardstep-unleash-your-strengths — Richard Sephenson

As we gathered for our final committee meeting, we mainly gave thanks for not having killed each other. It had been a long and frustrating process that, in the end, somehow worked out as had been hoped. So this meeting over food and wine still prompted me to ask, “For what are you thankful?” Besides gratitude that we had not killed each other, we were also thankful for the amazing fact that we were still talking to one another. In the two-plus years the project had lasted, one of us had learned to let go of his need to always be right, which he said was his cause of thanksgiving. Another had found a group where he really could voice his opinion. All of us were amazed that the members of the group were now friends, even after coming to know each other in almost embarrassing ways.  And there was, of course, our thankfulness that the project was over and the result looked promising. And it was enough.

There’s a trend on the Internet, maybe particularly on Facebook, to post a daily gratitude such as that a friend came to visit or a new office had opened. For Thanksgiving Day, 2013, Spirit Moxie asked people to list three things for which they were grateful. The responses included the love of a good woman, wonderful and patient friends, family, technology, and “the magical effects of yeast and grapes.” What’s interesting about this is that it has been shown that gratitude, giving thanks, can actually hard wire the brain to be more positive and more productive. Thanks makes our minds work more easily.

Why might this be true and what difference does it make? If you become positive in the present rather than feel happy only as a response to some event, such as a raise or a compliment, you are actually more productive and successful. In other words, it’s been proven that happiness leads to success rather than vice versa. When you are positive in the present, you are not dependent on events for your happiness. While the importance of gratitude is prevalent right now as a conversation, one way to see why this matters is by watching Shawn Achor’s TED talk,  which is one of the funniest and clearest defenses of how this works. According to his research you can rewire your brain through 21 days of two-minute exercises: thinking of three new things you’re grateful for or journaling for two minutes about one or exercising or meditating or sending a random positive email to someone. (No, you don’t need to do all every day. From what I read you just pick one a day, and they can be different ones.)

Happiness first, leading to a more effective life for us and, as a result, for those around us.

But what about just saying thank you? What about that automatic response when someone does something for us, hands us something, tells us something, or opens a door? The prod we give young children (“Say thank you!”) when someone gives them a candy bar or a dollar. The words most of us actually recognize in multiple languages. Gracias [Spanish]. Danke [German]. Merci [French]. ขอบคุณค่ะ kob khun ka [Thai]. [ASL]

Giving thanks. Saying thanks. Being thankful. I’d suggest that those simple words claim our interdependence. However much we’ve been trained to do it all for ourselves, “thank you” reminds us that lives are easier and more abundant because of those around us. “Thank you” tells others that we’ve noticed and, for that second, the world worked; the energy in it was changed a bit for the better. No, we don’t consciously think this every time, but it is the very automatic-ness of it that holds much of our day to day together.

So, the thank you note you did or didn’t write to Aunt Margaret, the thank you email the new rules say you should send after an interview, the text message sent after you got home from that special dinner (however ordinary it was), and the words to the kid who bags your groceries all matter. Plus there’s our gratitude for having groceries to bag, an aunt to write notes to, and for the Spirit Moxie “followers” who are reading this. “Thank you” is an easy way to begin with words and suddenly have our world work just a little better. Two minutes a day. For a lifetime or so. Report in. What are you thankful for and what difference have you seen?

Oh, and thank you!

_____________________

Photo credits from top:

Harvest fruit: California vineyards at harvest time – Damian Gadal
A good woman and friends – Bill Nienaber
Laptop and working lunch, © rcp:051010:a0021 – Rob Pearce

Obvious right? Voting is important. Sometimes throughout history casting lots, drawing a name out of a bag, or following some leader’s decree has decided things. And there are times when a clear consensus determines who should do what. But in today’s world, an election results in the most honest reflection of what we think is best for our country or our world. If you have the privilege of voting, you should do that. It’s part of freedom and responsibility and citizenship.

So are you voting? Here in the United States, 2013 is not a presidential election year. Even last year when we did elect a president, a disproportionate number of people seemed convinced that the election somehow wasn’t about them. I can still hear them. That their vote won’t make a difference. That they don’t like any of the candidates anyway. That no one who is any good dares run for elective office. That it is too much of a hassle.

Because I’ve worked for women’s organizations and have heard the stories of women’s suffrage repeated over and over, I particularly don’t understand women who don’t care that in 1917 several women were imprisoned for two months where they were essentially tortured, humiliated, and force fed when they went on a hunger strike so that she, the woman of today who doesn’t have time, could go to the polls last year, this year, next year, and every election year in the future and cast a vote.

And I don’t understand people who don’t appreciate the fact that we can just walk or drive to the polls and not be hassled at all except by those people standing a prescribed distance from the door campaigning for their candidate. Don’t appreciate that they’re not in a country where people risk their lives to go to the polls, where observers from other countries are invited to keep elections honest, and where the voters often don’t think much of their choices either, but are grateful that there are choices to be made.

For those into politics voting is fun. And even the rest of us make a game of it. Spirit Moxie tried to take a poll on Facebook for the best motto for the site. (You can still have a say. Do we talk about “little things to make the world work”? Or “little things to change the world”?)

But some games get huge results. For example during the Christian season of Lent, Forward Movement Publications plays with a certain sports metaphor by creating a “game” called Lent Madness. It creates a bracket of saints (yes, saints). But the competition between them is the vote! On each designated day people vote to declare bracket winners, as the competition goes through the days of Lent. Hundreds vote daily. The event has almost 1,500 followers on Twitter, more than 5,000 likes on Facebook, and was even mentioned  in Sports Illustrated!   People take sides, even organizations take sides. And it’s quite clear that votes count. (“The polls close in an hour and only 20 votes separate the two…”)  Here politics, voting, a little education, and a sense of play all come together. I’ve seen people campaign for their favorite saints and I’m told there are parties on election days.

But on the national election front voting somehow can get careless. It doesn’t have to be. It shouldn’t be. Last year I remember physically wending my way to the downtown office of the Board of Elections because I didn’t trust a mail-in absentee ballot. This year I congratulated a friend who made sure to vote before she headed off on a cruise. And as I don’t always know multiple local candidates, I called someone who does, who also shares my political views, for some input.

So are you willing to vote for fun? Are you willing to vote because whatever the issues are where you live, controversial or not, voting says you are willing to help change the world?

Picture credits from the top
voting instructions — liz west
Women in horse-drawn carriage and on foot march in street for voting rights carrying banners “Mothers Prepare the Children for the World…” “Women Need Votes…” and “Suffrage Pioneers…” — Kheel Center
041009_voting_bcol.h2 — Isaac Mao
Would billionaires spend millions to influence your vote if it had no value? — DonkeyHotey/Flckr